A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 28, 2016, the Defendant: (a) found the victim C’s restaurant operated by the victim C in the Gyeongbuk-gun, U.S. on or around 01:00 on December 28, 2016; and (b) took a breac arrangement, the Defendant: “A balked alk and discarded alk by death.”

쇠鹬

“In doing so, the victim’s restaurant business was obstructed by the threat of force between 20 to 30 minutes by taking a large amount of public bath and leaving the happiness.”

2. On December 28, 2016, at around 01:55, the Defendant: (a) received a report of 112 from a person who was fright at the above place; and (b) received a request to return home from G from G, who was dispatched to the site after receiving the report; (c) the Defendant refused to comply with the request; and (d) the Defendant “Isk and Ba Ba Ba k k kb k

C. Before putting a brub, flab by putting in, and putting in, Ra and albb, scarb, the scarb, and assaulted by brusing two shoulders of G on two occasions in two tights.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement by the police in relation to C and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (in-depth photographs, etc.);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following extenuating circumstances are considered in favor of the sentencing in mind):

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines shall be limited to the category 1 (Interference with the Execution of Official Duties) and the category 1 (Interference with the Execution of Official Duties) (In June to one year and six months) of the basic area (in June to one year and six months), and the scope of the recommended punishment [the scope of the recommended punishment] of the mitigated area (in January to eight months) [the scope of the recommendation] of the mitigated area (including a serious effort to recover damage) of the mitigated area (including a special mitigated person] of the mitigated area (including a serious effort to recover damage).