The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On April 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 14:30 on April 22, 2015, the facts charged, the Defendant heard five apartment residents, five finites, ten finites, and the security guards, etc., from the front road of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, about the following: (b) the Defendant stated that “the Defendant resisted the victim in front of the victim’s house to leave the products delivered to D; and (c) during the period of punishment for expenses with the victim, the Defendant openly insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim through a door that the security guards opened.”

2. Determination

A. In a criminal trial, the prosecutor bears the burden of proving the facts constituting the crime prosecuted, and the conviction should be based on the evidence of probative value, which makes the judge feel true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the defendant is suspected of guilty.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

B. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, it is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Defendant insultingd the victim as stated in the facts charged by the prosecutor alone, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

1. The defendant gives advice to the issue of delivery of the victim's door-to-door with the victim, and then entrusts the other customer's door-to-door service in the guard room. The defendant expressed the victim's complaint in the process of expressing the victim's desire against the female employee, etc. because he did not properly resolve the victim's civil petition.