logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.05.08 2015가단206765
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The defendant,

A. As to KRW 254,684,773 among Plaintiff A and KRW 239,045,105 among them, from January 31, 2015 to May 8, 2019.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiffs related to the parties A are as follows:

A person injured due to a traffic accident described in paragraph (1) is the mother of the plaintiff C, and the plaintiff B is the partner of the plaintiff A.

In addition, the defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the G car car driven by F (hereinafter referred to as the "automobile of this case").

B. Around 18:09 on June 5, 2013, F used the instant car to drive the instant car and drive the first road in front of the water tank located in the Hacheon-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-do into the new village room at the surface of the I elementary school, while the occurrence and progress of the instant accident, the Plaintiff J laid K on the front left part of the direction of the proceeding with the lower part of the bicycle (hereinafter “instant bicycle”).

) The left-hand part of the instant bicycle was found to have been left-hand (hereinafter “instant accident”) on the front part of the instant car without any delay, even though it was found to have been left-hand and left-hand.

2) The Plaintiff J suffered injury, such as the blood transfusion from a light-to-face in which there are no two or more open addresses due to the instant accident, a light-to-face brain in which there is no two or more open addresses, and a ductals of two ducts.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 4, 7, 10 evidence, Eul evidence 2 (including each number), the video and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the statements and images of evidence No. 4-1 to No. 4-3 and evidence No. 2-1 to No. 5, the accident site of this case is recognized as a place designated as a child protection zone in the vicinity of the house as an alleyway, and children with low caution compared to that of the above are allowed to go through the Alley intersection. Thus, a person engaging in driving service is driving at such a place with due care and care for the safety of children.

arrow