logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 09. 29. 선고 2016두45981 판결
(심리불속행) 토지거래허가가 나지 않은 상태에서 부동산이 제3자에게 소유권이전되는 경우 매매계약은 무효가 됨[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2015Nu51790 (23 June 2016)

Title

(In the absence of permission for land transaction, if a real estate is transferred to a third party without permission for land transaction, the sales contract will become null and void.

Summary

(In the first instance) Where real estate subject to a sale contract is not subject to land transaction permission, ownership is transferred to a third party at an auction procedure without any land transaction permission, the sale contract becomes null and void finally and conclusively.

Related statutes

Transfer Income Tax Act No. 105

Cases

2016Du45981 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

○ Kim

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

on October 23, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

on January 29, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the judgment below and the records of this case were examined, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal or are not reasonable. Thus, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow