logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.12.06 2015가합58828
채무부존재확인
Text

1. Medical treatment is given from September 3, 2012 to April 4 of the same month to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s network C.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) The Plaintiff A is G non-humane Post Hospital located in the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government F (hereinafter “Plaintiff Hospital”).

(1) The deceased C (H; hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) as a medical specialist employed by the deceased hospital.

(2) On September 3, 2012, the deceased provided medical treatment from September 3, 2012 to April of the same month, and on September 3, 2012, the deceased is the representative director who operates the Plaintiff Hospital. 2) On September 3, 2012, the deceased was suffering from acute cerebral cerebral dys, during which he/she was hospitalized at the Plaintiff Hospital and was hospitalized at the Plaintiff Hospital, and continued to receive medical treatment on October 3, 2016. The deceased was the deceased’s spouse and Defendant E is the children of the deceased.

B. On September 2, 2012, the deceased was in the emergency room of the Incheon Women’s Hospital due to symptoms, such as drums, flas, etc., which occurred before September 2, 2012, and was under the chest X-ray test, blood test, and heart test, but was not found any particular, and was prescribed only for drugs after being diagnosed with dynasium. 2) The deceased was in the hospital of the Plaintiff on September 3, 2012, and became in the Republic of Korea.

The Deceased, for three days prior to the date of 3 days before the Plaintiff, caused ice ice ice ice ices such as ice ice ice ice ices, etc., and said that there was no anything wrong with the CT shooting and blood test at the emergency room of the Incheon Empia Hospital.

C. As a result of the examination of the Deceased, Plaintiff A’s 1’s treatment test conducted by the deceased showed that it is difficult to keep its focus on both sides of ear, and that it is far away from the right side, and that it is difficult for the Plaintiff A to conduct a visual test in comparison with the attitude at the time of sunrise and at the time of giring, in a state where snow girs are gathered and giring.

arrow