logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.05.17 2016나11729
보증금등반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment, except where the relevant part is modified as follows. Thus, this is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be dried;

A. Of the first instance judgment, (1) Of the first instance judgment, “No. 3, 5, 8, 9 through 18, 3, 5, 8, 9 through 18, 3, 5, 8, 9 through 15, 17, 18, 18, 2, 3, 11 “I” and “K” respectively.

B. Part III through VII of the first instance judgment are added to the following.

B. Rather, the following circumstances revealed by the overall purport of evidence Nos. 3-4, 7, 11, 12, 16, 22, and Nos. 2 and 4 of the evidence Nos. 3-4, 7, 11, 12, 16, 22, and the whole purport of the arguments, i.e., the allegation that “H engaged in the same business with Defendant B,” is not reliable.

“A judgment of conviction (Tgu District Court 2014Ra422) is pronounced on the grounds of “B, etc.,” ② At an investigation agency, H made a statement to the effect that there was no fact that there was no investment contract between Defendant B and the investigation agency (Records No. 146 of the record), and that there was no fact that settlement was made according to the same business (Records No. 167 of the record); ③ H made a loan certificate of KRW 650 million to Defendant B on August 22, 2012; ④ K, who worked on the said T Trading, made a statement to the investigation agency that Defendant B had lent money to H and had not engaged in the same business with H (Records No. 201,202 of the record), and Defendant B made a statement to the effect that it was aware that it was a real operator of the above Telecommunication’s debt collection and its own debt collection.”

C. The part of the first instance judgment Nos. 3, 20 through 4, 300 shall be added as follows.

(c)".".

arrow