logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.10.07 2015구단58396
추가상병불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 17, 2014, the Plaintiff, as an employee of the Skjin Co., Ltd., Ltd., filed an application for medical care benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act with the Defendant on November 3, 2014, for “the instant accident that happens while carrying floor materials on the bicycle (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

B. On November 18, 2014, the Defendant approved the medical care benefits with respect to “the instant approved disease” (hereinafter referred to as “the instant approved disease”) and did not approve the “the instant approved disease part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the back part of the front part of the front part of the front part.

C. On June 10, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional injury and disease again with respect to the instant injury and disease, but the Defendant rendered a disposition not to approve the said application on the ground that the relation between the instant injury and disease is not recognized on June 22, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 5, Eul 1, 3 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the injury or disease of this case occurred or rapidly aggravated due to the accident of this case, and thus, the instant disposition taken on the premise that the relation to the accident of this case is denied is unlawful.

B. Facts 1) 1. After the instant accident, the Plaintiff was admitted to B Hospital on October 22, 2014, the five days after the instant accident occurred - The Plaintiff was admitted to the instant hospital, and at the time, the doctor’s diagnosis of the instant approved disease and the instant injury and disease, and on October 28, 2014 (the removal of flag in cases where there was a flag that caused damage between the opening of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the

arrow