logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.07.01 2015고단381
모욕
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the instant facts charged is C reporter who is an Internet media company.

The Defendant reported on the D website that “E” had the government’s budget for supporting non-profit, non-profit, non-governmental organizations under the title of “E” and flown out the SNS public opinion work of repair organizations, thereby openly referring to “Good School, Mangy School, School, School, and Parental Parent’s Meeting” as “an organization engaged in political activities oriented to the ideology of building the anti-Japanese,” thereby insulting the members of “Good School, Mangy School, School, School, and Parent’s Association.”

(Omission) In addition, the National Assembly of Bottleneck groups, which held the political assembly of the Do-friendly government tendency, was supported by 2010 to 2013,00,000 won. “National Action Headquarters” was supported by 187 million won in total from 2009 to 2013.

In the case of the National Action Headquarters, the police officer was sentenced to punishment by assault and aiding and abetting.

In contrast, the term “Korean Teachers’ Union” has been limited to KRW 92 million and KRW 45 million as subsidies, respectively, leading to a good school, a single school, a single school, a single school, a single parent group (2012-2013) and a local self-governing group (2013) affiliated with a democratic party, respectively.

Most of them are organizations that engage in ideologically political activities.

(Omission)

2. The corresponding part of the article of this case

3. The meaning of insult as referred to in the crime of insult and the offense of insult as referred to in the crime of insult of the reason for the exclusion of illegality are the expression of an abstract judgment or a sacrific sentiment which does not indicate a fact, and even in a case where a certain article contains especially insulting expressions, if such expressions can be viewed as acts that do not violate the social norms in light of the sound social norms of the times, illegality is exceptionally dismissed in accordance with Article 20 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Do1433, Jul. 10, 2008). 4. Determination of the instant case, and health class, and the instant case.

arrow