(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.03.10 2017고정30

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.03.10 2017고정30

자격모용사문서작성등

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) voluntarily stated “B”, “A”, “A”, and “A” in the reporter’s personal information column, and submitted the said report of closure to the person in charge of the tax office having no knowledge of the fact, in the name of the business owner of the site for the report of closure which was kept in the place; (b) there was no fact that the power of representation was granted by B; (c) on the business owner of the site for the report of closure that was kept in the place; and (d) on the column for the report of closure of business.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising another person's qualification, the defendant prepared and exercised a document to prove his rights and duties or facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of business closure report and business registration certificate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 232 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (a point of preparing private documents for qualification) and Articles 234 and 232 of the Criminal Act (a point of uttering of private documents prepared for qualification) and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (the punishment to suspend a sentence: fine of one million won, and one hundred thousand won per day of detention in the workhouse) (In full view of the following: (a) there are extenuating circumstances in light of the background of the crime; (b) the defendant is a primary offender; and (c) the conciliation has been concluded in the relevant divorce case (the mother of the defendant and the injured party) arising from a dispute between his/her family members; and (d) there is an agreement that the defendant will not raise any civil or criminal objection; and (b) the circumstances leading to the alteration of the sentence will be deemed to

참조조문

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2016.07.13 2016고단440

-의정부지방법원 2018.04.18 2017고정2546

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.09.08 2017고단824

-서울서부지방법원 2018.11.07 2018고정888

-서울남부지방법원 2017.11.10 2016고정2220