1. The Defendant’s each of the Plaintiffs’ KRW 30,00,000,00, as well as 5% per annum from December 18, 2017 to October 11, 2019.

1. The facts subsequent to the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or are recognized by taking into account the respective descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3 through 7, and 11 and the overall purport of the arguments.

A. The Defendant, with knowledge that the network D, who is a worker, had no driver’s license, had the worker drive the vehicle and let the worker load the waterway.

나. D은 2017. 12. 18. 강원 철원군의 작업현장에서 혼자 지게차를 운전하여 수로관을 적재함에 있어 지게차의 기어를 중립에 두고 사이드 브레이크를 걸지 않은 채로 이에서 내린 후 지게차 앞에서 기적재된 수로관에 받침목을 올리는 작업을 하였는데, 지게차가 지면의 경사로 인해 앞으로 밀리면서 기적재된 수로관과 지게차에 적재된 수로관 사이에 협착되어 같은 날 20:21경 흉곽의 으깸 손상 등으로 사망에 이르게 되었다

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The plaintiffs jointly inherited D's children each of their 1/2 shares.

2. According to the above facts of determination, it is reasonable to view that the accident of this case occurred as a result of the violation of the duty to properly direct and supervise the safety by urging D’s employer to pay attention to the slope of the ground at the work site, and checking whether the work requiring D’s divorce is safely performed. It is obvious in light of the empirical rule that the plaintiffs, who are the children of D, suffered mental pain.

Therefore, the defendant has a duty to write down this in money.

Furthermore, as to the amount of consolation money, in light of various circumstances shown in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the health team, the facts and circumstances of the instant accident acknowledged by the aforementioned facts and the evidence, the number of bereaved family benefits received by the Plaintiffs from the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation, and the relationship between the Plaintiffs and D, etc., five days of consolation money.