Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is his father and husband of Defendant B, Defendant A, and Defendant A, around November 11, 2009, subscribed to the “E” goods of the victim D Co., Ltd., which paid the insured amount of KRW 20 million in the event of death or injury caused by traffic injury upon the death of the beneficiary, and KRW 20 million in the event of death or injury caused by traffic injury upon C’s legal heir, on the premise that C does not drive a two-wheeled vehicle. After joining the contract, Defendant A, the policyholder of the contract, bears the duty to notify the victim company of the fact, even though C sold a vehicle going through a usual meeting, and around October 27, 2015, Defendant A did not notify the victim company of the fact.

On August 6, 2017, the Defendants stated that the insured C would have caused the occurrence of the insurance accident resulting from the traffic accident of the motor vehicle during the operation of the above Oba, and C would in collusion to conceal the fact that it was directly and continuously using the above Oba, and to receive the above insurance money, and that “C would not have operated the above Oba, without permission, and continued to use the Ebac,” and that the above Ebacacacacacacs to the effect that “A would have caused the occurrence of the accident during the operation of the Ebacacacacacaca, but it is suspected that the U.S. would have continued to drive the Ebacacacacac, without permission, and that there is no ground for continuous use of the Ebacacacacacac, it does not constitute a breach of duty to notify the Defendants after concluding the contract, and thus the victim would have to pay the Ebacacacacac.