logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2012.11.29 2012고단4986
부정경쟁방지및영업비밀보호에관한법률위반(영업비밀누설등)등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, Defendant B and C by a fine of five million won, respectively.

2. Defendant B and C respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From January 1, 2007, he/she served as the head of Daegu Branch Office of the Victim E insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “victim”) from around December 16, 201, and worked as the manager of the Daegu Branch Office of the Victim Company from around August 26, 2010, Defendant B as the manager of the Daegu Branch Office of the Victim Company from around August 26, 201, and Defendant C as the victim company and the insurance solicitor from around November 27, 2006, and only on December 16, 201.

No person shall acquire or use business secrets useful for the enterprise or divulge them to a third party for the purpose of obtaining unjust profits or inflicting damage on the enterprise.

Defendant

A around November 201, when there is a limit to sell only insurance and financial products of the victim company, and did not depend on the victim company, and decided to operate the agency of the independent corporation called F (Change to G around January 9, 2012) that sells insurance products through partnership with several insurance companies, and suggested that Defendant B and Defendant C were defective in the same manner in the above stock company F, and Defendant B and Defendant C were able to withdraw from office to F after accepting Defendant A’s proposal.

1. Defendant A retired from the victim company, and Defendant A had the victim company’s major business information about customers who had been managed in a normal manner, and had the victim company’s major business information, and had the victim company F for continued use.

On November 21, 2011, the Defendant, at the Daegu Branch Office of the Victim Company, obtained permission for the use of mobile storage equipment from the Victim Company by deceiving the Victim Company to obtain data to be used in the course of outside lectures, and then, included the number and product name, the contractor's name, date of birth, address, etc., 96 insurance solicitors, and the date of appointment of 96 insurance solicitors.

arrow