logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.09 2015노4804
산업기술의유출방지및보호에관한법률위반등
Text

1. Defendant A

A. The part of the judgment of the court below against Defendant A is reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months.

Reasons

The facts charged prior to the revision of the judgment of the court below and the facts charged prior to the amendment of the judgment of the court below [co., Ltd.] The victim F Co., Ltd. developed a number of software, such as the search engine software program of 10 billion won per annum used by customers, including the State and public institutions, and the I University, at least 3 billion won per annum, including the search engine software program of 10 billion won per annum used by customers, and the I University, and the I University program of plagiarism inspection of 700 million won per annum. A number of companies possessing a large number of business secrets, including relevant information and data acquired in the development of the software, including meaningful-based search technology, big data diversification management technology, and related information and data.

Defendant

A From January 1, 200 to March 31, 201, from around January 1, 2000 to around March 31, 201, a person who served as the business development team leader in charge of the business development team and the business business team, and Defendant B, from January 2, 2006 to September 26, 201, worked as the head of the marketing team; Defendant C, from July 17, 2006 to June 7, 2011, was a person who retired from office as the head of the marketing team; and Defendant C, from July 17, 2006 to the business development team leader, was a person who retired from office as the business development team leader; Defendant A, B, C (the last premise at the same time to the end of the premise), and is obviously written in the indictment of this case as Defendants C and B, but is clearly written in the indictment of this case.

A around July 8, 2011, a company established for the purpose of the development of software and services with the trade name of D Co., Ltd., and Defendant A was the representative director, Defendant B, and C were the directors of each D Co., Ltd.

[Criminal facts]

1. Any person who violates the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act and the Act on Prevention of Divulgence and Protection of Industrial Technology shall aim at gaining unjust profits or causing loss to a company;

arrow