logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.13 2011가합83283
손해배상(의)
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff B’s KRW 296,769,692, Plaintiff A’s KRW 7,905,759, and each of the said money from December 20, 2010.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The parties concerned are operating the Medical Center at Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, 63-10, tolin University Slinsung Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

Plaintiff

A was treated by the defendant hospital from September 25, 2010, and the plaintiff B was given birth through the king operation conducted by the D defendant hospital medical staff.

B. From September 25, 2010, the 28th anniversary of pregnancy, Plaintiff A started to undergo a medical examination at the Defendant Hospital. At the time, the blood pressure was 114/67 (piction / complete)mHgs, and the result of the first radio wave test was also normal. The Plaintiff A, on November 26, 2010, 141/87mHgs of 141/87mHs of her pregnancy, was at the vicinity of the boundary line (140/90mHs) of her high blood pressure (140/90mHs), and on December 4, 2010, the 37th day of pregnancy, was measured by 137/89mHs, and the 137th day of pregnancy, was at the lower level between Plaintiff A and Defendant C on December 16, 2010.

The medical staff at Defendant Hospital was hospitalized by Plaintiff A to keep the Plaintiff’s condition and proceed with only a minute.

Plaintiff

A At the time of hospitalization, blood pressure was 140/98m Hg, body temperature was 38.0 mHg, 38.0 m. At the time of hospitalization, CR was 123.6 g/L (normal range 0-5mg/L), red blood-related mouth was 106 m/hr (normal range 0-20 m/hr) and white blood-related 14.15 K/L (normal range 4-10 K/L). The 2-3 mpin in self-fash, 80% in satis, and embryoba-3.

Plaintiff

A observed the same quality of water at the time of hospitalization, but the medical professionals at the Defendant Hospital determined that there was no stop fever on the basis of the fact that all voice reaction occurs in the etropha test, the propic fever test (PRM) and the etropus.

On the other hand, in order to determine whether there is a arctal urology, there is no discovery of arctal urology in the arctal urine test.

arrow