logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.10.12 2017고단2179
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동협박)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, each of the above punishments shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 13, 2017, around 19:20, the Defendants found at the above location in order to receive money that Defendant A lent to D at the parking lot located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulcheon-ro 82-1, Seocheon-gu, Seoul-do, U.S., U.S., in order to receive money that Defendant A lent to D, and Defendant B confirmed as “the wife” in the front indictment of the above D, but upon examination of evidence, Defendant B confirmed as “the front wife.”

the victim E and following the victim, "I am the house of D" to the victim who is listed in the car.

Defendant A, who was waiting in the vicinity while living together with the money to be received, was frightened by Defendant A, and Defendant A, who was threateninged by the victim to “I am flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly

n Don Don Don Don

In threatening “the victim’s Handphone, thereby confirming the details of the victim’s telephone call with the above D, and then putting the phone to the above D and thereby threatening the victim in such a way as to bring the victim’s arms to get off the said car and to prevent him from getting off the said car.”

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statement - The Defendants’ fact that Defendant A, at the time, led the enormous machine to the floor and paid sound, but there was no other speech or behavior as shown in the above facts constituting the crime.

- The statements consistent with the facts stated in the judgment of the victim, which are directly examined as witnesses, are believed to be consistent with the victim's statement attitude, etc., and even if the defendants' assertion is true, the defendant 1) to receive money from the former husband of the victim, and the defendant 1 to receive money from the former husband of the victim, is apartment at the low time.

arrow