Defendant

A Imprisonment for four months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 4,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On November 24, 2018, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) avoided disturbance, such as asking the victim under the influence of alcohol at the ENow shop operated by the victim D in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (b) caused the disturbance of the victim, by avoiding the disturbance, including: (c) “The business is terminated; (b) the victim ; (c) the victim sees the horses; and (d) the victim sees the sound; and (d) “I will see how I will see I am. I am. I am. I am. I am.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the four-day union operation of the victim by force.

B. When the Defendant was arrested a flagrant offender from the police officer G belonging to the F Zone G of the Suwon Police Station, who was called for after receiving 112 a report, due to the suspicion that the Defendant continued to interfere with the business without leaving the above place of business, the Defendant made intimidation, such as “I wish to die, I kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) 1, reported the Defendant’s friendship A who arrested a flagrant offender and moved to the patrol lane on the same ground as the entry in paragraph 1(a) at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1), followed the Defendant’s sound to H in the circumstances belonging to the Suwon Police Station F District Unit of the Suwon Police Station: “I am going to live in the fluor of why he is living in the fluor; I am to the fluor, I am to the fluor, I am to the fluor, etc. of the above H’s left hand on three occasions; two times the left shoulder on the hand floor; and one time the left face on the drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1.I.D.