Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. At around 20:00 on May 21, 2015, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s business operation of the restaurant by force by avoiding the disturbance between approximately 30 minutes of the victim’s disturbance, i.e., the victim F, who was the president of the above restaurant, told “E” restaurant located in Yongsan-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul, with the attachment of a trial expense.

B. When the Defendant was at the time and place indicated in the preceding paragraph, and when 112 reported and sent out, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate duties concerning the dispatch of the above H at the 112 reported site on the ground of the following: “Chewing, public authority, and brans attached to bransing” to the above H; and in drinking, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate duties regarding the dispatch of the above H at the 112 reported site.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant interfered with his duties: (a) at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1) of Article 1, the Defendant collected the items on the table with A, and took sound, and (b) received a request from the victim F, who is the above restaurant operator, to send them out of the restaurant, thereby preventing customers from entering the restaurant, and thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 30 minutes from that time.

B. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, as described in the preceding paragraph, arrested a flagrant offender at the crime of interference with business by the police called out after receiving 112 reports, and led to the G District of the Busan Police Station around 21:20 on the same day.

The Defendant, a police officer belonging to the foregoing patrol group, who intends to sit the Defendant within the said patrol group, expressed the desire to “Y, governance, I, I, to see, I, and thereby interfere with the legitimate duties of police officers in relation to the custody of suspects by taking the head of the above I once by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. H, I, .