1. The claim of this case is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 25, 2013, the Plaintiff visited the D Hospital located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) operated by the Defendant, and complained of the right shoulder.

The medical doctor belonging to the Defendant Hospital diagnosed the Plaintiff as the right pyrosis, and the Plaintiff hospitalized the Plaintiff in the Defendant Hospital on the same day for the surgery, and around July 26, 2013, the Plaintiff implemented the stude and the stude-type therapy on the revolving revolving revolving revolving revolving satis, using the satise satise satise sat

B. Since July 29, 2013, the Plaintiff discharged the Plaintiff on July 29, 2013, and for recovery treatment, from July 27, 2013 to August 8, 2013;

8.13.

8.16.

8. around 20. Around 20.m., the Defendant hospital was admitted to physical therapy.

C. However, around August 22, 2013, the Plaintiff appealed to the Defendant Hospital that there had been a sudden pain since two days prior to the Defendant Hospital.

As a result, the medical professionals of the defendant hospital taken the plaintiff's shoulder into CRI, it was found that there was a opinion of re-secting the right turning.

Accordingly, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital conducted drug treatment for four weeks from August 22, 2013, and provided physical treatment from September 24, 2013 to October 31, 2013.

E. On November 6, 2013, the Plaintiff confirmed that the father, who performed an operation at the Medical Center of the Non-Party East National University, was suffering from the influence of the operation. On November 26, 2013, the Plaintiff received again a felture operation at the right wheeling from the above hospital.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, Eul evidence No. 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was around August 20, 2013, in the process of receiving physical treatment from a physical clinic affiliated with the Defendant Hospital, and the physical clinic ended in the process of excessively spreading and enjoying the arms performed by the Plaintiff. While the Defendant hospital had a duty of care to provide appropriate treatment so that the Plaintiff’s surgery does not damage the Plaintiff’s surgery, the Defendant hospital breached its surrounding duty and caused the result of malopic fever.