logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.07 2016고단2855
항공보안법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 9, 2016, around 20:30, the Defendant 272 to the Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu Airport No. 14, Incheon International Airport No. 14, aviation KE623 to the Republic of Korea aviation KE623 to the Republic of Korea, the passage of the Defendant was passed for the purpose of identifying passengers on the ground that the crew B, who collected another passenger's banks from the string line when she walked the passage, she was moving back to the front line of the gu Incheon International Airport No. 2016, and that the crew B, who collected another passenger's banks from the string line, she was moving back to the string line of the Defendant.

male crew members want to be equal to that of male crew members, and in spite of the victim's intention, they take the hand phone in their possession.

In other words, the victim got off one time.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the crew's duty of confirming passengers by force, and inflicted an injury on the head of the head who requires approximately seven days of medical treatment on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the relevant criminal facts, Articles 49 (1), 23 (1) 7 (a) of the Aviation Security Act (a point of interference with crew's duties by force), Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of harm), and selection of fines;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Provisional Payment Order is that the defendant interfered with the work of the aircraft crew and inflicted bodily injury upon the aircraft crew.

On the other hand, there is a reflection that agreement with the victim has been reached and wrong with the victim has been submitted.

In addition, it is recognized that there is no history of criminal punishment.

In full view of the above circumstances and other circumstances, the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, health status, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the conditions of sentencing as shown in the instant pleadings.

arrow