A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 12, 2017, at around 03:20, the Defendant: (a) cut off one knife of the market price equivalent to KRW 2,000, which was displayed by a cresh in the management negligence of the victim D, an employee, from “C convenience store” located in Chuncheon-si B; (b) around November 12, 2017.

” 고 고함을 치면서 편의점 카운터 앞 과자 가판대를 밀어 넘어뜨려 위 F의 왼쪽 발등 부위를 찧게 하는 등 폭행하여 경찰관의 범죄수사에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each statute of the D and F

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment (abstinence to the performance of public duties, a choice of imprisonment), and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (abstinence to the performance of public duties and

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. 보호 관찰 및 사회봉사명령 형법 제 62조의 2 양형의 이유 이 사건 범행은 피고인이 절도 범행을 저지르다 발각된 직후 신고를 받고 출동한 경찰의 공무까지 방해한 것이어서 그 죄질이 매우 불량한 점, 피해 경찰은 과자 가판대에 발등을 찧는 피해를 입은 점( 상해진단서도 제출되었다), 피해 경찰과 합의되지 않은 점, 피고인은 재산범죄나 폭력범죄로 처벌 받은 전력이 다수 있고, 그 중에는 징역형의 집행유예를 선고 받은 전력도 있는 점 등은 피고인에게 불리한 양형 요소이다.

However, the fact that the defendant seems to have recognized the crime of this case and reflect it, in the case of larceny, the damage is deemed to have been recovered, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant in agreement with the victim.