2015Do809 homicide, damage to a corpse, abandonment of a corpse, larceny, and Specialized Credit Financial Business Act

Violations

2015 Beforemado144 (Joint Attachment Orders)

A

Defendant and the respondent for attachment order

Attorney AS (National Ship)

Seoul High Court Decision 2015No762, 2015No64, 2015No57 decided May 15, 2015 (each combination)

July 23, 2015

All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Defendant case

Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, it is just that the court below rejected the argument of the defendant and the respondent for an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as "defendant") on the mental and physical disorder based on the circumstances as stated in its reasoning, and there is no violation of law as

In addition, examining various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, means and process of committing the crime, and circumstances after committing the crime, the lower court cannot be deemed to have sentenced the Defendant to 30 years of imprisonment.

2. As to the case of the request for attachment order

As long as the defendant filed an appeal against the accused case, the appeal is deemed to have been filed regarding the case claiming an attachment order. However, the appellate brief does not state the grounds for appeal and the appellate brief does not contain any statement of grounds for appeal as to this part.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Kim Jae-sik et al.

Justices Lee Sang-hoon

Justices Cho Jong-hee

Chief Justice Park Sang-ok