logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2012.07.13 2012고합92
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 6, 2012, at around 19:12, the Defendant driven a Dap Gap in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.312% from the section of approximately 100 meters of alcohol alcohol level to the roads in front of the Gu and the Gu and the Gu and the Gu and the Gu and the main apartment).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written statements on the state of driving, reports on occurrence of traffic accidents, and photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts, Articles 148-2(2)1 and 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act, the current Road Traffic Act, which has the reason for sentencing sentence of imprisonment with prison labor, provides that any more strict punishment shall be imposed on a person whose blood alcohol content is not less than 0.2 percent for the purpose of preventing the drunk driving threatening to the safety of road traffic and overcoming the awareness of such fact. On September 9, 2005, the defendant was sentenced for 10 months by imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at Daejeon District Court (Seoul District Court), and on October 23, 2006, the defendant was sentenced for 4,000,000 won by a fine in violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch Branch branch of the Daegu District Court (Refusal of Drinking Measures) and so on, in addition to the case where a summary order has been issued, it is inevitable to consider that the defendant has been sentenced for more than 10 times as at the time of the crime of this case.

In this context, the period of punishment, such as the order, shall be determined by taking into account all the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing specified in the pleadings of this case, including the health, age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow