The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of 6 million won) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant's mistake is divided and reflects the defendant's behavior, the defendant has been punished for the same crime several times, the current Road Traffic Act stipulates that the person who has violated the prohibition clause on drinking under the influence of alcohol more than twice in order to prevent the driving under the influence of alcohol and to realize the awareness of it, the person who has violated the prohibition clause on drinking under the influence of alcohol more than twice in order to drive under the influence of alcohol again. In addition, in light of the motive and background leading up to each of the of the crimes in this case, circumstances leading up to the crime in this case, the age, character, and environment of the defendant, the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.