logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원(전주) 2014.03.27 2012나2748
유언무효확인
Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the following part of the judgment of the court of first instance is changed, and thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2.In the first instance judgment after replacement, among the written judgments;

(a) from 3 pages 15 to 17 shall be applied as follows:

F. At the time of the death, the deceased’s parents and siblings had already died. The deceased’s wife, who was a sibling of the deceased C, succeeded to the deceased’s property by inheritance with other co-inheritors, as the deceased’s sibling, together with the deceased’s other co-inheritors. Meanwhile, as the deceased’s death on July 21, 2013, the Plaintiff and the designated parties inherited his/her property.

(b) by means of an authentic document in Part 5, paragraph 1, the term "a will by an authentic document" shall be filled in as "a will by an authentic document."

(c)each “Plaintiff” in Chapters 5, 7, and 11 shall be incorporated into “The Network A;

Part 5, Chapter 17, from No. 6 to No. 11, the entry “I.D................”

"No.4" If a will cannot be made by means of a self-written document, sound recording, notarial document or confidential document due to illness or any other urgent reason pursuant to Article 1070(1) of the Civil Act, the testator is entitled to the intention of the will to one of two or more witnesses in the presence of the two or more witnesses, and the testator and each of the witness approved the accuracy of the will. There is no evidence to see that the document of this case was ill or other urgent circumstances at the time of preparation of the document of this case, and there is no evidence to see that the document of this case was written by the deceased C, and the document of this case was written by means of writing and writing by one of them under the presence of two or more witnesses at the time of the will.

arrow