Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (defluence assault, etc.) at the Suwon Franchising Methods Board on March 27, 2015, and the indictment on September 8, 2015 stated that “ September 17, 2015.” However, according to the descriptions of the inquiry about confinement information, the Defendant was deemed to have been executing the detention of the Defendant for a period from September 9, 2015 to September 17, 2015.

On April 20, 2016, the execution of the sentence was completed, and on May 23, 2016, the Daegu District Court was sentenced to two years of imprisonment due to the crime of destroying special property in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch.

On January 10, 2016, the Defendant 22:32 around 22:32, at a soup set set of Drup in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the victim E (55) who is an employee, and “I are in a low season for male string.”

“The victim must see this dog, open to the public, and supply the victim with a strong mind, on the ground that the response attitude of the victim who is known to him does not appear in mind.”

It is possible to write down the sonship.

In doing a bath theory, “the victim batdd with batling and bating the bat of the victim’s bat.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement in the police statement protocol against E;

1. Videos of the flaps and photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes stated in judgment attached to a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, the inquiry screen of a court case, inquiry of expropriation information, and investigation report;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the detention of the workhouses are imposed on several occasions, and the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime and did not recover from damage. However, the degree of assault inflicted by the Defendant seems not to be serious.