A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 24, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Western District Court for a false accusation, and on January 29, 2016, the Seoul Southern Southern District Court completed the enforcement of the sentence.

Around 08:50 on September 25, 2016, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by saying, “The Defendant was given notice of attendance at the trial by the victim D, a police official belonging to the police unit C District Police Team in the Hansan Police Station C District on the Mayang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Incheon-do, Incheon-do, to the center of the 1171 Sinsan-do, that is, on the ground that there was a large number of traffics, on the ground that there was a harmony.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement in each protocol of examination of the witness to D and E;

1. Complaint;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Summary of case information, result of inquiry of expropriation information, application of the text of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reasons for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes are as follows: (a) the Defendant repeated the offense during the period of repeated crimes; (b) the denial of the offense; and (c) the Defendant did not reflect his or her wrongness; and (d) other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the offense; and (c) the sentencing as indicated in the record and the theory of change, including the circumstances after the crime