logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.09.14 2017고정1389
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 31, 2017, at around 18:00, the Defendant: (a) 2nd floor corridor in the southnam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the victim E (n, 65 years of age) operated by the Defendant, on the ground that the said victim was a woman who is not suitable for the Defendant to live in the other person; (b) was satching the victim’s body by sating the victim’s body, sating the victim’s face; and (c) caused the victim’s face by the blue blue blue 28 days, the Defendant laid down the 2nd top left-hand part of the upper left-hand side, which requires treatment for about 28 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements made to the defendant in the police interrogation protocol (including the E substitute part);

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury E;

1. The standing parts and the left-hand flag photographs, etc. of the flag's E-Pact;

1. The 112 case settlement table, respectively;

1. Investigation report (the other party to the suspect or the doctor who has issued the written diagnosis of injury);

1. The investigation report (the other party investigation of a shote) [E and G are unclear, and considering the following circumstances, it is recognized that the statements of E and G have been made under particularly reliable circumstances, and thus, the evidence is admissible under Article 314 of the Criminal Procedure Act and the credibility of the statements is also recognized.

A. On February 2, 2017, the Defendant and the victim respectively completed the interrogation of the suspect, and the victim immediately examined the suspect. The Defendant and the victim were made the other party’s statements and were given an opportunity for rebuttal.

The victim’s statement was consistently maintained in the process of questioning the Defendant that “the Defendant was faced with elbow face after putting head debt on the wall and being sealed in the wall.”

② On February 2, 2017, at the time of interrogation of the Defendant and the victim, the police taken photographs of the victim’s inner body and the part of the satisfic body.

③ Even according to the police statement of the defendant, the victim was rapidly challenged at the time of the defendant's oral dispute.

“The phrase “ .............”

arrow