The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

In spite of the fact that the defendant had inflicted injury on the victim, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the judgment.

The punishment (fine 500,000) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined at the court below's determination of facts: (a) victim F, a witness of the court below, was present at an investigative agency and the court below only after the consultation with the defendant; (b) the defendant saw the surrounding area of her entrance into the court; and (c) the defendant saw the inside of her entrance into the court; and (d) he stated that the defendant had talked with the president before her entrance; (c) the statement corresponding to the facts charged in this case is concrete and consistent; (d) the defendant tried to prevent the victim from entering the police interrogation and had her hand or arms on the part of the victim; and (e) the victim F, a witness of the court below, made a statement that she had made a statement to the extent that she had no possibility of suffering from the victim's injury after her entrance into the court below; and (e) the victim's statement that she had made a statement to the extent that she had made a statement to the victim's injury after her entrance into the court below.