beta
Text
1. Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for six months, Defendant B’s imprisonment for one year, Defendant C and D respectively for a fine of KRW 5,00,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 23, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six months at the Seoul Western District Court on June 23, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 14, 2015.
Defendant
A and Defendant B, along with G, conspiredd to engage in the business of arranging sexual traffic by leasing the Seoul Mapo-gu Htel with G. From August 2013 to May 21, 2014 (Defendant A up to February 2014), leased Nos. 218, 1905, 1914, 2201, 2414, 2908, 3101, and 3302, which were recruited through the Internet site specialized in entertainment job seeking, including “I,” etc., to arrange sexual traffic to allow male customers to engage in sexual traffic, and to receive KRW 120,000,00 for sexual intercourse from the above male customers at night, and to arrange sexual traffic as consideration for sexual intercourse, Defendant A appears to have engaged in the business of arranging sexual traffic, etc. from around 30,000 to 40,000 of the charges.
Defendant C appears to be a clerical error in writing in the facts charged in the indictment of the chief of the night office from August 2013 to the end of the day-time office.
As a result, the telephone reservation was received, the customer was informed in the room, and the customer was recovered from sexual traffic paid by the customer.
As a result, the Defendants conspired with G to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.
Defendant D, around 19:40 on June 11, 2015, was employed on the day at “O” store operated by the victim N in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-gu, and performed work, Defendant D, the head of the management department P, who was the manager, did not lock the locker for the day at the credit cooperative that did not set up the locker between the operator and the operator, did not in excess of KRW 2.5 million in cash owned by the victim, the sales on the day.
They go back.
Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the property owned by the victim.
Summary of Evidence
"2016 Highest 905"
1. Defendant B’s legal statement
1. The respective legal statements of Defendant A and C
1. Legal statement of the witness Q Q;
1. Defendant B.