logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.11.16 2017고정497
저작권법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is C University Fire Safety Department and professor.

D Around March 2012, as a joint work jointly translated by G, H, I, J, K, L, L, M, N, andO from E’s business employees, the P received a request for additional defects in Qu as an author, not the author, on March 10, 2004, and the Defendant, R, and S accepted the request for additional defects in Qu from T and U, a business employee of E, not the author, in Qu, not in the book of the above " Qu" from T and U, a business employee of E on March 2015.

At around March 10, 2012, the above F published the so-called “mark conflict” book, which was added D to D as a joint translator even though D is not an author of Q, in the name of book publishing E. The above T, U around March 10, 2015, in the above E office, even though Defendant, R, and S were not the author of Q, the so-called “mark conflict” book added to Defendant, R, and S as the author of Q, was published in the name of publication of the book.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspireds with the above T, U, F, etc. and made a work public by indicating the real name of a person other than the author as the author.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. T legal statement of the witness;

1. Each investigation report (a copy of suspect A's departure confirmation, each mark of false works, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Article 137(1)1 of the Copyright Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no fact in conspiracy with T, etc., on the issue of the main text of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant consented to the registration of Q as a false joint author in the instant case.

Top, this Court has duly adopted it.

arrow