logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.05.13 2019가단159090
보증금반환
Text

1. The Defendants jointly do so within the scope of the property inherited from Defendant C, D, E, F, and G from the net B.

Reasons

1. In addition to the addition of words below the facts of recognition, the entry of “recognition” in the attached Form is as follows.

"On the other hand, Defendant C, D, E, F, and G applied for qualified acceptance on the inheritance of the deceased B's property, and on February 1, 2019, they received the Seoul Family Court Decision 2018Ra8739 (Seoul Family Court).

[Reasons for Recognition] Defendant K, L: Confession (Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act); The remaining Defendants: the absence of dispute; Gap evidence No. 1 to 7; Eul evidence No. 1 and No. 2; and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the Defendants jointly (the obligation of co-inheritors to refund the lease deposit is indivisible in its nature), within the scope of the property inherited from the network B, Defendant C, D, E, F, and G are liable to pay to the Plaintiff the lease deposit amount of KRW 40,000,000, and damages for delay at the rate of 12% per annum from February 6, 2020 to the date of complete payment, as the Plaintiff seeks.

3. The Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant C, D, E, F, and G is accepted within the above recognition scope, and all claims against the remaining Defendants are accepted.

arrow