1. Within the scope of the property inherited from each net B, to the Plaintiff:

A. Defendant C: 23,33,333;

B. Defendant D.

1. There is no dispute over the cause of the claim. In full view of the purport of the entire argument in Gap evidence No. 1, the plaintiff's claim for the amount of KRW 70,00,000 against Eul was made, Eul died on September 9, 2014, and the fact that Eul, the spouse of the defendant C, the children of the defendant D, E, and F, was recognized as the inheritor of Eul, and thus, the plaintiff is obligated to pay damages for delay from May 30, 2018 for each of them, the following day after the delivery of a copy of the complaint in this case.

According to the evidence Nos. 1-1 and 2-2, the Defendants are obligated to pay the above money within the scope of the property inherited from the network B, as the Defendants reported the qualified acceptance on December 2, 2014, and received an adjudication on the qualified acceptance under the Suwon District Court 2014Ra2795, Suwon District Court 2014, Dec. 17, 2014.

Therefore, within the scope of the property inherited from each network B, Defendant C is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at each rate of 15% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act from May 30, 2018 to September 11, 2018, which is a considerable amount of dispute over the scope of the Defendants’ performance obligation, to the Plaintiff, within the scope of the property inherited from each network B, as well as 23,33,333 won, Defendant D, E, and F, as well as 15,55 won per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the date of full payment.

2. To accept part of the Plaintiff’s claim for conclusion