1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On November 12, 201, the Plaintiff received medical care by September 27, 2012 due to occupational accidents where the left knee kne kne on the concrete floor (hereinafter “the instant accident”) while working for cleaning services in B, the Plaintiff was at the right side of the slot pipe, and was at the end of half of the left side of the slot pipe, the left side kne kne kne on the left side, and the Plaintiff received medical care by September 27, 2012.

On March 13, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-treatment with the Defendant on the ground that active treatment is necessary because there is a possibility that the same father may re-satise the same father after the completion of the medical care for the instant injury and disease.

On April 18, 2013, the Defendant: (a) did not confirm the Plaintiff’s opinion of re-ion; (b) did not coincide with the Plaintiff’s pain and injury to the instant injury and disease; and (c) did not require the active treatment of the instant injury and disease; and (d) issued a disposition of non-approval of the medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

On June 11, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a request for examination against the Defendant, but was dismissed on June 11, 2013, and the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee filed a request for reexamination on July 25, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including partial number Nos. 1 and 2; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole argument of the disposition of this case is legitimate at the time of the plaintiff's conclusion of the medical examination of this case, since the plaintiff's medical examination at the time of the plaintiff's assertion as to whether the disposition of this case is legitimate, the treatment of this case is very unfair from the defendant's disposition that has closed the medical treatment because it was a situation that requires medical treatment at the time, and the symptoms of the plaintiff's appeal to the plaintiff are confirmed to remain in a half of the half of the half of the half of the half of the medical opinion, and the scope is expanded compared to the half of the half of the medical examination at the time of the completion of the medical examination, and the plaintiff'