All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. The summary of the case and the facts premised on the case

A. The summary of the instant case is the case seeking revocation of the Defendant’s non-disclosure decision-making disposition on the ground that the Plaintiffs filed a claim with the Defendant for disclosure of the detailed contents and expenses of the development project, such as infrastructure, etc. entered into the construction project for the Young Yung Urban Development that the Defendant implemented against the Defendant based on the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”), but received a decision from the Defendant as non-disclosure regarding the pertinent documents.

The judgment of the court of first instance accepted the cancellation part of the disposition rejecting disclosure of information in attached Form 2-1 and 3 among the plaintiffs' claims, rejected or dismissed the remaining claims, and the defendant appealed against the part against which he/she lost (the part of information in attached Form 2-1 and 3).

[Related Acts and subordinate statutes] Attached Table 3

B. On the premise, 【Evidence 1, B-1, and the purport of the entire pleadings (i.e., the Plaintiffs are buyers who purchased BU apartment houses within the business area executed by the Plaintiff from BT, etc., and the Defendant jointly with the Incheon Urban Development Corporation based on the “Special Act on Designation and Management of Free Economic Zones”, the Defendant is a project implementer that implemented a project to develop the Young-gu Incheon Free Economic Zone Young-gu Si Small and Medium-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Development Project (Sacheon-gu Round, Hanam-gu, Hanam, Ha-dong, and Jungsan-dong

⑵ 원고들의 정보공개청구와 피고의 비공개결정처분 ㈎ 원고들이 BT 등으로부터 분양받을 당시 영종하늘도시의 각종 개발사업의 시행한 주체인 피고는 집합건물의 신축에 필요한 택지를 조성하면서 토지의 가격에 각종 개발사업비용을 포함하여 택지의 가격을 산정하여 BT 등에 대하여 택지를 분할하여 매각하였다.

The Plaintiffs confirm whether the Defendant’s development project was suspended for a long time or the business itself was damaged by blanking, and shall be liable for damages against the Defendant.