1. The plaintiff's claims that the court changed in exchange for the defendants are all dismissed.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. On October 27, 2009, between the Plaintiff and the Defendants engaged in waste collection, transportation, etc., the association agreement including the following contents (hereinafter “instant association agreement”) was concluded (hereinafter “instant association agreement”).

Article 1 (Purpose) The purpose of Article 1 (Purpose) is to reduce costs by efficiently operating human resources and equipment due to excessive competition, and to provide mutual assistance as a result of friendliness between members, in the original city, the original city, the domestic waste collection and transportation business entity, including Defendant E Limited Partnership D (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant D” by omitting the limited partnership area, and the remaining Defendants also refer to the same method).

Article 2 (Clerical Work Office) The Operational Work Office shall use the Office with an address in E in the original city.

Article 4 (Vehicles and Distribution) Joint-Invested and Operation of Food Vehicles and Waste Transport Vehicles, and may increase the number of vehicles and reduce the number of vehicles in accordance with the operation policy.

Dividends shall be 1/4 out of profits.

(Provided, That after the expiration of the contract, the vehicle shall be returned to the original owner). All expenses for the vehicle jointly invested under Article 5 (Motor Vehicle Management) shall be shared.

Article 9 (Effect) The effect of a contract shall be from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015.

B. After the conclusion of the instant association agreement, the Plaintiff and the Defendants jointly engaged in the business at the office located in the original city E, which was Defendant D’s office, and jointly participated in the “F Service” that was implemented from 2010 to 2011 by the Plaintiff, Defendant B, and C on December 16, 2009.

Since January 2012, the Plaintiff was awarded a contract for “G services” which was implemented from 2012 to 2014, and the Plaintiff and the Defendants jointly provided the said services.

(c) 29 persons, including H, in total below H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, Q, S, U, V, W, X,Y, Z, AB, AD, AE, AE, AF, AH, AH, AI, and AJ.

the wages and wages against the Plaintiff as 2016Gahap5012, the Chuncheon District Court's original state branch.