All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) that the lower court sentenced the Defendants to each sentence (7 million won by each fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The facts that the Defendants led to the confession of the instant crime are favorable to the Defendants.

However, in full view of the fact that the Defendants used farmland 1,379 square meters outside the agriculture promotion area without permission, and the nature of the crime is not good, and other various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the background of the instant crime and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s sentence against the Defendants did not appear to be unreasonable, and thus, the Defendants’ wrongful assertion of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since all appeals by the Defendants are without merit, they are all dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Provided, That the application of the law of the court below to the law of the court below is obvious that the "Article 34" was omitted after the "Article 34" of the 2, 20, 21 of the 2, 21 of the 2, the written judgment of the court below among the application of the law of the court below. Thus, it is corrected to add this ex officio in accordance with Article