[Defendant A] Imprisonment with prison labor for six months

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, “2017 Highest 2165,” is the representative director of a limited company I who is engaged in the business of building a ship at H at the time of leisure, Defendant F is the owner of a leisure ship J, Defendant G is the representative director of L Co., Ltd., the owner of Incheon ShippingK, and Defendant G is each engaged in the maritime oil transport business.

No ship owner shall assign the structure of the relevant ship, alter or remodel the structure, engine, equipment, etc. after undergoing a shipbuilding inspection or ship inspection.

1. On March 25, 2013, Defendant A and F violated the Safety Act of Ships: (a) Defendant F built the said J (49.1m, width, 9.15m, depth, 4.4m, gross tonnage, 322 tons) which is oil transport vessel under the said limited liability company I operated by Defendant A; and (b) registered the vessel after construction inspection to the Korea Coast Guard.

On August 21, 2013, the Defendants conspired to make two valves (1.1m, 7.63m in length, 3.74m in depth, 31,390m in volume) on the upper deck, and continuously made two valves (10cm in diameter, 4m in length) on the upper deck so that oil tanks can flow through a secret tank without supplying all the duty-free oil supplied by static oil in the ocean-going line, and partially embezzled oil tanks installed in the above J for sale.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to undergo a building inspection and subsequently remodeled the facilities of the relevant vessel.

2. On November 23, 2016, Defendant G violated the Safety Act of Ships A and G built the said K, which is oil carrier’s oil (50.59m in length, 9.15m in width, 4.4m in depth, 337 gross tonnage) at the above limited liability company I operated by Defendant A, and registered the ship after construction inspection to the Korea Coast Guard.

On December 1, 2016, Defendants: (a) conspired to commit an act in collusion on the oil tank installed in the above K without filing a remodeling report for the purpose of sale by embezzlement of a part of the duty-free oil supplied by Company I from static oil; (b) and (c) make it difficult for the Defendants to use the duty-free oil supplied by static oil.