(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2014.09.04 2014고정133

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2014.09.04 2014고정133

상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 20:05 on November 16, 2013, the Defendant, as the building owner of the E pharmacy operated by the victim D (the age of 38) in Thai-gun, Thai-gun, Thai-gun, had the victim and the lessee walked 3-4 times on the left spath of the victim's spath because he did not pay the monthly rent, and had the victim walked 3-4 times on the left spath of the victim's spath, and had the victim spath from the stairs of the victim's spath to the restaurant, she got the victim's spath from the stairs of the victim's spath to the head, and had the victim go beyond the victim's spath for treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Recording notes;

1. Investigation report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant asserts that, although at the time of the instant case, the Defendant did not assault the victim as stated in the facts constituting a crime, although he/she had stringed the victim’s body.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence revealed as follows: (a) the victim consistently stated from the investigative agency to this court that the victim sustained assault from the victim as stated in the facts constituting a crime; (b) the statement of G, the principal restaurant, also conforms to the statement of the victim; (c) the defendant and the victim had a dispute over the issue of payment of rent at the time of the instant case; and (d) the defendant sought the victim to urge the payment of rent at the time of the instant case; and (e) the defendant seems to have been significantly interested at the time of the instant case, the fact that the defendant inflicted injury on the victim as stated in the facts constituting a crime.

참조조문

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 서산지원 2020.05.13 2019고정318

-인천지방법원부천지원 2020.10.21 2019가단24737

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.24 2013노4433

-울산지방법원 2019.01.11 2018고단316

-의정부지방법원 2020.05.07 2018노3108