A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 15, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution as a result of interference with the execution of official duties in the Jeju District Court's original branch court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 23, 2017.

1. On September 4, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) by the Jeju District Court on September 4, 2007. On June 30, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for four months or one year of suspended execution for the same crime, etc. in the same court on June 30, 2009. On January 7, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million for the same crime, etc. at the same court on January 7, 2010, and violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

On October 14, 2014, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license for a vehicle at around 21:30, driving Bing MZ vehicle at a section of about 2 km from the Gung elementary school in the city of Gangseo-si to the front day of the city of Gangseo-si, while under the influence of alcohol at least 0.059% of the blood alcohol level in the blood.

2. When the Defendant’s act of forging a private document or exercising the said investigation document was controlled by the slope C and slope D belonging to the Gangnam Police Station at the above time and place, the Defendant committed the Defendant’s death “E” to be exempted from punishment, and committed each act by entering the Defendant’s name in the signature column of the alcohol driving control report, the signature of “E” in the signature column of the vehicle driver’s circumstantial statement report, and signing the signature, each of the instant police officers, who are unaware of the said fact, forged the signature of “E” for the purpose of exercising the right, and submitted the said police officer’s signature to the said police officer as if they were genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police of the F and E;

1. Notification of the results of regulating the driving of alcohol, report on the situation of the driving driver, access management to officers and employees, and the register of driver's licenses;

1. Previous conviction in judgment: Inquiry into residents' criminal history, each investigation report (9, 11), summary order, and application of statutes applicable to the judgment;

1. Criminal facts;