The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the statements of the victim of mistake of facts D, E, witness F, etc., the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant as to this part of the facts charged, despite the fact that the defendant invadedd the above D's residence as stated in the charges of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) and infringed upon the above D's house, taken the knife between possession and the above D's intimidation, and recognized the fact that the above E was threatened,

B. The sentence (one million won of a fine) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Determination

A. 1) The summary of this part of the facts charged is as follows: (a) On November 3, 2008, the Defendant entering a residence intrusion on the part of this part of the facts charged; (b) around November 21:44, 2008, the Defendant entered the house of pro-friendly victim D (the age of 42) located in the original city C, and entered the house beyond the wall and invaded the victim’s residence on the ground that the victim was not present

B) On the same date and time as in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (collectively, deadly weapons, etc.) (collectively, threat) takes away the victim E (28 years old) from the victim E, who was the victim D's wife, from the second floor of the above victim D's complaint, and takes the victim E (28 years old), "non-Micker" and "I will throw away the knife (30 cm length of the day) which is a dangerous object," and "I will throw away the victim D's knife" and "I will throw away the victim D's knife, knife the victim D's knife, and the victim D's knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.

The defendant's door is a stamper.