logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2015.11.27 2015고단695
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 695]

1. Around 05:30 on May 11, 2015, the Defendant was boarding a same-sex elementary school in front of the same-sex elementary school in Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, and had the victim operate the said taxi until the front of the forest apartment in Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, despite having no intention or ability to pay the taxi fee, the Defendant had the victim pay the taxi fee in spite of the absence of the intention or ability to pay the taxi fee.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, had the victim drive a taxi and exempted the victim from paying KRW 23,00,00, thereby acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

2. On May 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 11:00, on the street in front of the “E cafeteria” located in Sacheon-si D, on the ground that the victim F (inn, 51 years of age) made a cret while taking a bath; and (b) placed the victim’s click at his hand, scambal scam, etc. requiring approximately seven days of treatment.

3. On May 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 10:40 on the street in Sacheon-si, G, the Defendant left the left-hand leg, where the victim H (the 64 years of age) was pushed away from her face; (b) was tightly left by hand when the victim’s chests were pushed up, frighted into her chest, and fright down to the right side of her head, and when the victim was under the left side of the drinking eye, the Defendant left the left-hand leg, etc. for about 14 days.

[2015 Godan1035] On July 18, 2015, the Defendant ordered the victim to hold the cosmetic 40,000 won of 40,00 won in the cosmetic 201, which was operated by the victim J of the victim J in Sacheon-si, I commercial store 201.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if he received the cryping wave from the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, did not pay the amount of money to the victim even though he was provided with the joint hosting strike service from 17:30 on the same day, thereby acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to the amount of money.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 Height695] 1.

arrow