beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Justice] On October 8, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny in the Daejeon District Court’s Branch of the Daejeon District Court for the purpose of larceny and completed the execution of the said sentence on December 29, 201.
【Criminal Facts】
1. Larceny;
A. At around 07:30 on September 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the E-cafeteria operated by the victim D located in Asan City, the Defendant stolen the following: (b) at the E-cafeteria operated by the victim D; (c) KRW 100,000,000 in cash, which was placed in the calculated window window by means of the cresh in the victim’s presence; (d) KRW 2,000,000 won in cash; (e) KRW 1,000; (e) one seal imprint; (e) one cellular phone in the market; and (e)
B. At around 08:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) entered the stolen passbook at the cash payment season, such as the above paragraph (a), and stolen KRW 2,00,000 on two occasions by inputting the password prior to the entry of the password.
C. The Defendant from around 18:00 on September 18, 2014 to the same year.
9. From around 14:50, the victim D, located in Asan City F, opened a door as a stolen key, such as the above paragraph A, and cut off one yellow knife (19cm in total length, 8.5cm in length, 8.5cm in length) at the market price of the victim owned by the victim, one color knife (22cm in total length, 11cm in length in length in knife) and one yellow knife (22cm in total length, 11cm in length in knife).
At around 13:00 on September 28, 2014, the Defendant, at the “J” restaurant operated by the victim I on the H 1st, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, and at the time of being employed as an employee, stolen the amount equivalent to KRW 126,00,000, which is the market price of the victim’s possession, by taking advantage of the gaps in which surveillance by the victim was neglected.
E. On October 7, 2014, the Defendant, at around 13:30, used the gap where the victim’s surveillance was neglected while working as an employee, from “N” Chinese restaurant operated by the victim M in Asan City L.