logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.11.21 2018고정512
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 11, 2017, the Defendant driven a taxi belonging to Ccontinental traffic (ju) around 18:57, and changed its course from 6-lanes to 2-lanes from 6-lanes to 2-lanes from 3-lanes to 3-lanes from 6-lanes to 3-lanes from 6-lanes to 3-lanes.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, and has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reporting well the traffic situation of the motor vehicle and safely driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and thereby caused the damage to the damaged vehicle by taking the part of the victim D (W, 42 years old)’s k5 wheel Sheet, which was located adjacent to the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, as a part of the fences front the Defendant’s driver’s seat in front of the Defendant’s driver’s seat, and damaged the damaged vehicle’s property KRW 523,356.

As such, the driver who caused the traffic accident immediately stops and took necessary measures such as removal of other traffic obstacles or risks, but left the site without any measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Blue boxes and video CDs;

1. The defendant asserts that the judgment of the defendant on the investigation report (written estimate) is that the traffic accident of this case was not committed by himself, and that the victim only left the victim's vehicle in the vicinity of the accident site.

However, according to the above evidence, in particular, the victim's vehicle was engaged in stopping by red signal while driving a two-lane, but it can be found that the accident occurred while the vehicle of the defendant was changed from 6 vehicles to 2 lanes, so the defendant's vehicle was negligent in the accident.

The defendant is judged (the defendant is the driver of the taxi, but the accident video is in this court.

arrow