logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2013.09.12 2013고단871
도로교통법위반등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be four months by imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 8, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a mixed-type SCR100 Oral Bab, where C Number plates are attached; (b) when driving the above Oral Bab on May 14:20, 2013 and driving it at Pyeong-gun, the Defendant changed the course to one-lane while driving it along the two-lane from a school surface to a two-lane. In such a case, the Defendant did not change the course when it is apprehended that a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle would impede the normal traffic of other motor vehicles driving in the same direction from a one-lane; and (c) even though there was a duty of care to safely change the course of the vehicle and prevent accidents by safely changing the way of the vehicle, he/she neglected to perform his/her duty of care so that the victim's driver is damaged by the victim's damages to the above one-lane road due to occupational negligence and caused the damage to the victim's right part of the vehicle.

2. Around March 2012, the Defendant violated the Automobile Management Act and the illegal use air defense event: (a) around March 2012, the Defendant used the registration number plate for an unlawful use by transferring the registration number plate attached to CT100 Oral Bab owned by the Defendant to the said mixed-use, SCR100 Oral Baba; and (b) exercised the air defense that was used unlawfully by operating the Oba with the registration number plate attached illegally used at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), operated the said mixed CR100 Oral Ba, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, on the road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Entry of the police statement concerning D;

1. Statement of the comprehensive details of vehicles;

1. Statement of the mandatory insurance policy;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to be written in a written estimate.

arrow