1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part of the judgment against Defendant D Co., Ltd. and E Co., Ltd. is revoked, and the plaintiffs D.

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation concerning the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for any additional modification as follows. Thus, this is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. 추가변경하는 부분 ◆ 제1심판결 3쪽 8행의 “원고는”을 “원고들은”으로, 9쪽 1, 2행 및 18쪽 1행의 각 “원고”를 각 “원고들”로 각 변경 ◆ 제1심판결 8쪽 마지막행 아래에 다음과 같은 내용을 추가 『5) 이 사건 1, 2 결의 당시 피고 회사들의 각 주주명부에는 피고 회사들의 각 발행주식 50만 주 중 별지 목록 기재와 같은 주식 각 35만 주를 피고 C이 소유한 것으로 기재되어 있었다.

』 ◆ 제1심판결 18쪽 2행 내지 19행을 다음과 같이 변경 『가.

If stock certificates have not been issued even after six months have passed since the incorporation of the company at the time of the agreement for stock transfer, which was made for the purpose of securing related legal bonds, such agreement has the effect as a security for stock transfer immediately (see Supreme Court Decision 93Da61338, Jul. 28, 1995). In addition, even if the transfer of stock is made in the meaning of a security for transfer, and even if the transferee is not against the mortgagee, the mortgagee is qualified as a shareholder in relation to the company, and even if the transferee is not against

(See Supreme Court Decision 92Da84 delivered on May 26, 1992). Meanwhile, in a case where a transfer of shares was already made in the name of the transferee on the register of shareholders of a stock company after the transfer of registered shares, the said share transfer agreement was subsequently cancelled or cancelled.

However, unless the name of the shareholder on the shareholder registry is restored to the original name of the transferor, the transferor cannot oppose against the shareholder to exercise the voting rights at a general meeting of shareholders in relation to the corporation.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2000Da69927 delivered on December 24, 2002).