logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.06.19 2013가합3276
부당이득금
Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs the amount of unjust enrichment stated in the separate sheet No. 4 and each of them from February 1, 2011.

Reasons

(b) approved and commenced.

(2) After February 2, 200 to October 200, the Defendant obtained approval to revise each business plan to build 1,934 households among 1,935 households, 1,934 households among 1,935 households, 3 complexes 1,290 households, 1,263 households among 1,93 households as public rental housing (hereinafter referred to as “public rental housing of this case”).

(C) The first tenant invitation notice was issued by the Defendant from November 1, 1999 to October 200 with respect to public-lease households, and the terms and conditions of the conversion for sale are as follows. The period of conversion for sale for sale is as follows: The basis for calculating conversion for sale after five years from the first day of the month following the month in which the first occupancy designation period ends: Method of calculating conversion for sale for sale under attached Table 2: Calculation of conversion for sale under attached Table 3-3 [Attachment 2] of the Enforcement Rule of the Rental Housing Act: Construction cost and appraisal value at the arithmetic average of construction cost and appraisal value * Construction cost at the first tenant recruitment price

D. After the sale in lots or public sale in lots of each apartment of this case, the plaintiffs and plaintiffs G (Attachment 1's list Nos. 2), and H (Attachment 1's list Nos. 24) stated in the attached Table 4's calculation table were concluded with the defendant as to the corresponding units and numbers of the apartment of this case, and the sale in lots of this case had arrived at the time of sale in lots around 2006 through 2008 as stated in the attached Table 5's "the date of contract conclusion" stated in the attached Table 5 as to each corresponding unit and number of the above units and units as stated in the corresponding date, and the sale in lots was completed with the defendant as to each corresponding unit and each of the above units and units as stated in the attached Table 5's "public sale in lots". On the other hand, plaintiffs I (Attachment 1's list Nos. 42 and 3's list Nos. 42 and 3's list are listed in the attached Table 1.

arrow