The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant, who runs a fireworks house, was aware of the victim B (V, 49 years old), and was forced the Defendant to work from the Defendant’s fireworks shop as an employee.

At around 21:00 on March 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim on the part of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Victim’s House on the ground that “the victim provided money to the Defendant and provided money to the Defendant and provided clothes, etc., but he did not provide money to the Defendant; (b) the victim was not provided with money to the Defendant without any delivery; (c) “the victim’s face is changed, snick, snick, snick, and snick, snick, snick, and snick, snick, snick, snick

2. Article 327 Subparag. 6 of the applicable Criminal Procedure Act, Article 260(3) and 260(1) of the Criminal Act (an indication of non-existence of punishment on September 22, 2016, which was after the institution of public prosecution).