Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, on September 2010, was aware of his knowledge in the “Fac shop” operated by the Defendant in the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on September 2010.

The 15 million won that was lent to G was caused by the victim H, and the franchising against the victim, which led to the franchisation of the franchisation of the franchisation of the franchisation of the franchis.

“Alongly sound and assaulted the victim at one time by taking the victim’s cream.

2. No person who has collected claims in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act shall assault, threaten, arrest or detain, or use deceptive schemes or force against, the debtor or his/her related persons in connection with the collection of claims;

A. In order to collect the amount of money lent to I from March 15, 2010 to September 5, 2010, the Defendant found to be an I’s house located in the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City of the end of the Gyeonggi-gu on September 2010, the Defendant “a woman’s house in the same year and her house as such garbage”;

- whether the person, in the same year as the fraud, has been so fraudulently and fraudulently committed;

In order to pay the money, the victim's head debt was shakened, and the victim's parts, such as the victim, etc., were assaulted several debtors.

B. In order to collect the money that the Defendant lent to the victim I as referred to in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant sought as “L” music points for the victim I’s operation in Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu on the same day, the Defendant committed an act of collecting the money by exercising the power on the part of the obligor.

(c)

In order to collect the amount of money lent from around August 30, 2010 to March 5, 2012 to the victim G, the Defendant sought N,O, and P as the house of the victim G located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on June 7, 2013 and demanded the victim’s parents to repay the amount on behalf of the debtor, with sound to the effect that “N, O, and P shall return the money borrowed by his/her husband and wife to the victim’s parents.”