logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.05.02 2012고단6027
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On the ground that the Defendant is a bad credit trader, the Defendant was aware of the resident registration number B, which was used as a construction-related work, in the name of the Defendant, to open the cell phone in his name.

1. At around 11:00 on September 27, 2012, the Defendant: (a) posted the editing files on the computer screen at the D office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul Metropolitan Government Office; and (b) printed out and downloaded them; and (c) posted them on the name column and resident registration number column of the Defendant’s driver’s license in the name of the director of Seoul Provincial Police Agency, and copied the driver’s license.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged a copy of the driver's license for B in the name of the director of the Seoul Local Police Agency.

2. On September 27, 2012, at around 14:40, the Defendant forged private documents, using the clleh mobile application form kept in the Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, with the color pen, indicated “B” in the customer name column, “E” in the resident registration number column, “E” in the resident registration number column, “B” in the applicant column, and “B” in the applicant column. The Defendant signed the application form following the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a new application for mobile phone in B, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

3. When the Defendant applied for a mobile phone from F’s staff H who is aware of the forged facts at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, the Defendant submitted one copy of the forged driver’s license and one copy of the mobile phone as if they were duly formed, and held the same respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to forged driver's license or forged mobile phone applications;

1. The corresponding provisions of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts; and

arrow