A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 6, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court on April 6, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 14, 2012.

1. The Defendant, together with the Defendant’s joint crimes B, C, and D, conspired to obtain money from other persons by iceping out the laundry projects of high-ranking public officials, etc.

On April 1, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around the Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, used the victim G (39 tax) to operate a business with high-ranking employees, such as senior public officials, the NIS, and government loans; (b) there is a high-level government-level government-oriented organization; and (c) through this, there is a money laundering of the former president’s vision and keep the money in the head of the Tong.

Although the head of the Tong was bound, it is reported that he purchases warehouses in which non-funds are kept together with high-ranking posts.

If the investment of funds is made, it would be possible to conclude a work within one month, and it would give two times the principal invested and receive KRW 3 billion with the money contributed to the investment, and the purport of the same shall be stated, and the victim may receive a prize to submit a certificate of personal seal impression to the victim.

In other words, the victim made the victim believe that the above speech is true.

However, even if the defendant received money from another person, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the benefit in two times or to pay the contribution.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, was delivered KRW 220 million in total from the victim, 14 copies of KRW 15 million check, cash KRW 10 million on the same day.

2. On August 21, 2010, the Defendant, who committed the sole crime, stated that “If the Defendant sent KRW 2 million as expenses are needed to complete the work, the Defendant will end the work” with the victim’s marization.

However, even if the defendant receives such money, he thought that he will consume it individually.